Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Remember this headline from October 11, 2011?


(1994 DSHEA)"FDA is willfully and grossly misinterpreting.."

The comment period ends December 2, so act quickly and feel free to borrow from our submission. And be sure to keep an eye out for further developments in this critical campaign.  The Citizens for Health Team

Here's a blog report from "Sandy's Insights" that I found today that gives further developments:
"Daniel Fabricant, FDA Director for Division of Dietary Supplement Programs, asked this question at last week's comment period webinar..., 'What kind of legacy (it) wants to have—one with unsafe products on the market with the potential to harm consumers, or one that is compliant with the law?'...
"From what Fabricant said during the webinar (check out the full press coverage here), it seems FDA isn't going to budge on a lot of the points industry took issue with in comments filed. Fabricant referred to, and read directly from, DSHEA more than once. He said the plain reading of the statue shows NDINs are for supplements, not ingredients...

"As I noted in my last blog, from here, industry is stuck waiting to see what FDA's next move it (sic), unless a company wants to try to challenge the Draft Guidance in court. But issues of standing could be problem. Now, we twiddle our thumbs and hope FDA can be persuaded by comments submitted by industry. Time will tell."

In spite of the FDA's prior argument, that of being concerned about ingredients, now the FDA director is changing it to being in reference to supplements instead of ingredients.  What ideas do you have that we all need to be doing to protect DSHEA? 


Monday, December 26, 2011

Video - "Poisioned Horses" from Fluoridated Water


True Story - of Wayne and Cathy Justus of Pagosa Springs, Colorado, and their discovery that fluoride poisoning was responsible for killing their beloved show horses.

Video--"NEW PLAN...Take Back your Health Freedoms"


video


"Health Liberty is a nonprofit coalition formed by Mercola.com, National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), Fluoride Action Network (FAN), Institute for Responsible Technology (IRT), Organic Consumers Association (OCA), and Consumers for Dental Choice, to help protect every American's freedom to make voluntary health choices. Each partner-organization has a rich history of advocacy and active campaigning for change and better access to truly empowering health information."

Friday, December 16, 2011

What?!? Medicaid Funds to be Used on Fluoridation??

NY State May Waste Medicaid Dollars on Fluoridation

Information provided by NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation - Published: 2011-12-06
 
The NYS Department of Health proposes to spend Medicaid funds on fluoridation equipment, supplies and staff despite clear evidence that fluoridation fails to prevent tooth decay in NYS and can be health-harming.

Disabled World - Disability News for all the Family:
 
 

2 Legal Cases That Won Against Fluoride

While searching for anything successful about getting rid of fluoride in community drinking water, I received this google alert below that lists a very good attorney who used the courts to fight fluoride in two different states and won both cases. Anybody know how to contact his office or staff who helped him with these cases??

UMarmot (Special Collections & University Archives) University of Massachusetts Amherts Libraries
http://www.library.umass.edu/spcoll/umarmot/?p=4696

Graham, John Remington, 1940-


John Remington Graham Collection, 1978-1982. 2 boxes (3 linear feet).
As the principal attorney representing the plaintiffs in two lawsuits to prevent the fluoridation of civic water supplies, John Remington Graham had a profound impact on the antifluoridation cause. In November 1978, Graham convinced Allegheny County (Pa.) Judge John P. Flaherty to prohibit fluoridation in the borough of West View, Pa., with the judge writing that it was “simple prudence” to do so in the face of evidence that fluoride was a carcinogen. Four years later, Judge Anthony Ferris ruled similarly in the case of Safe Water Foundation of Texas v. city of Houston, citing not only the carcinogenicity of fluorides, but their toxicity and inefficacy in reducing dental decay.

Consisting of the trial transcripts of Paul Aitkenhead v. Borough of West View (No. GD-4585-78) and Safe Water Foundation of Texas v. City of Houston, District Court of Texas (151st Judicial District, No. 80-52271), the Graham collection documents two high-profile, successful attempts to use the legal system to prevent the fluoridation of public water.

Subjects
•Water--Fluoridation--Law and legislation--Pennsylvania.
•Water--Fluoridation--Law and legislation--Texas.
Contributors
•Graham, John Remington, 1940-.
Types of material
•Legal files.
Call no.: MS 724View related collections: Antifluoridation :: No Comments

Monday, December 12, 2011

Professional Perspectives on Fluoride (video)

The below documentary is about Dr. Osmunson, DDS, who used to be for fluoride.  Watch and see what happened to change his mind about it.  After viewing this, please share your thoughts below:

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Videos--Treatment Plant/Supplier Admits Danger

Video of Hidden Camera at Austin Water Treatment Facility
Never-before-seen undercover footage shot at the Austin Water Treatment Facility demonstrates the process of adding the corrosive and highly toxic chemical to the water supply---

http://www.infowars.com/infowars-hidden-camera-fluoride-treatment-facility-nightly-news-report/

Also on same above video weblink:  Company Admits Fluoride Harming Children with Dr. Cole, DDS & Dr Pressley, PhD
A new Material Safety Datasheet (MSDS) issued by Mosaic, one of the largest suppliers of hydrofluosilicic acid has admitted the dangers posed by the industrial waste-product it sells to water treatment facilities. In-studio guests from Fluoride Free Austin, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS and Laura Pressley, PhD. in physical chemistry, demonstrate the risks of fluoridation, while highlighting the increasing trends to remove it from public water supplies.