Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Ongoing San Diego court trial about hydrofluosilicic acid used to fluoridate their water - Letter to Editor in Hamilton, NZ - Washington State's attorney website for "Fluoride Class Action Lawsuit"

Blumenthal Nordrehaug & Bhowmik File A Reply Brief In Water Fluoridation Case
San Diego, California (PRWEB) October 14, 2013
Read more:

On October 10, 2013, the California lawyers at Blumenthal Nordrehaug & Bhowmik filed a reply brief in the ongoing water fluoridation lawsuit asking the Court for a trial to present the modern science supporting their claims. The original Complaint was filed in August of 2011 and claimed that the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is distributing a drug through the public water systems even though the drug has not been approved by the FDA to fluoridate our drinking water. Foli v. Metropolitan Water District is pending on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, Docket No. 13-55302.

According to the reply brief filed by the California attorneys at Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik, “[we] challenge the Metropolitan Water District's selection and use of Hydrofluosilicic Acid ("HFSA"), the hazardous waste by-product of making fertilizer, as a drug delivered through our water supply for preventive medicinal health purpose, without any FDA approval or supporting toxicological data for this substance.”

Blumenthal's reply brief went on to state, "One can only imagine how toxic this chemical compound must be if the fertilizer industry would reject this witches brew as an additive to our soil." The lawyers at Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik asked the Court to reverse the decision of the lower court and allow a trial on the issues presented in the brief.

The lawsuit seeks to stop the Water District’s alleged practice of injecting HFSA into the water supply on the basis that HFSA was never approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of disease or dental cavities. See Foli v. The Metropolitan Water District, Case No. 11:CV:1765.

When asked about the lawsuit, the managing partner of the law firm for the Appellants, Norman Blumenthal, stated, “there is simply no reason here as to why this Court should not allow a trial as to whether in accordance with the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution there is a rational basis for the Water District's distribution of a drug to consumers without FDA approval for preventive health purposes."

Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik is a California contingency fee law firm that represents employees and consumers in individual and class action lawsuits against companies that violate state and/or federal laws.
Read the full story at

Hamilton fluoride referendum - Trevor Crosbie
"Dear EditorWaikato DHB chief executive Craig Climoe is wrong if he thinks the fluoride referendum vote outcome is a mandate to reinstate water fluoridation..."


From Attorney James Robert Deal: The flurosilicic acid added to our water contains lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and thallium. It leaches lead from pipes.  It is not safe, not effective, and not legal.
[Below is the current article and other weblinks on Attorney James Robert Deal's website:]

How did Barack Obama become Monsanto’s man in Washington? Apr29by Jon Rappoport

Thanks to How did Barack Obama become Monsanto’s man in Washington? By Jon Rappoport April 29, 2013 And when are anti-GMO activist groups going to stop saying they’re “shocked and disappointed” by the president? Shocked and disappointed is polite-speak and politically correct reaction. It’s […]

Below are "My Links" to Attorney James Robert Deal's website:

Lead-Fluoride Connection

Sham Regulatory Agency

Fluoride Encyclopedia

Fluoridation Facts

Interesting Blog Posts

What Is In It?

Fluoridated Toothpaste

Fluoridation - Illegal 

Fluoride Class Action
{James Robert Deal
PO Box 2276
 Lynnwood WA 98036
 425-771-1110, }

No comments:

Post a Comment