Thursday, January 31, 2013

Only 2 studies, 2010 and 2011, where hydrofluorosilicic acid was tested for its effect on humans for the first time in history, and both studies PROVE the damage it does while posing as "fluoride" in our drinking water! Read Dr. Mercola's coverage of this with Jeff Green, National Director for Citizens for Safe Drinking Water....

Fluoride Proponents Never Actually Tested "the Real Thing"

Part of the difficulty when discussing water fluoridation is that many do not realize that the fluoride you find in drugs, for example, while harmful, is not quite as bad as what's being used for water fluoridation.  The fluoride added to your drinking water is not pharmaceutical grade.
It's a toxic industrial waste product.
Deepening the deception is the fact that none of the studies on fluoride actually used the far more toxic hydrofluorosilicic acid that is added to the water supply. Rather they use pharmaceutical grade fluoride, so the health hazards are likely FAR worse than any study has so far discerned. (Below quote from Jeff Green, National Director, Citizens for Safe Drinking Water) -
"So when someone uses the word fluoride, I believe we start with a deception from the very beginning," Green says. "… [T]here is almost a bragging by the promoters of fluoridation that you don't have to study it because they have studied fluoride over and over again, yet they have never looked at the actual product itself until just recently!
In 1998 to 2000, I was able to get a congressional investigation on fluoride.  At that particular time, the House Committee on Science allowed us to write some questions that would be sent out to various entities.  Originally it was to the EPA…  We asked them to send the scientific data they had on the silicofluorides.  They wrote back [saying they] couldn't find any [data] for chronic effects of the use of hydrofluorosilicic acid or the silicofluorides. 
They didn't have any at all.
Up until 2010, and now 2011, there have only been two studies that have dealt with the continued use of hydrofluorosilicic acid. 
[T]hey were able to finally confirm, through these toxicological studies, the very thing they had found through large epidemiological study—that there is a higher amount of lead that shows up in blood.  In the epidemiological study it was 400,000 children.  It showed that there was a tremendous increase... four times as much for Latinos, seven times as much for blacks, and a[n on average] doubling of the danger level of lead in children's blood, when hydrofluorosilicic acid was present in the water."
The importance of that was that it was also compared to having no fluoride added into the water and [pharmaceutical grade] sodium fluoride added into the water.  So there was really a difference between the specific products being placed in there.

Fluoride Increases Heavy Metal Accumulation in Your Body

These studies also showed that hydrofluorosilicic acid increases lead accumulation in bone, teeth, and other calcium-rich tissues. According to Green, the free fluoride ion actually acts as a transport of heavy metals, allowing them to enter into areas of your body they normally would not be able to go, such as into your brain.
"Industry prizes what we call fluoride compounds," Green says. "What's amazing is there is so much [information] out there that's never explained to the general public.  But [fluoride] is… the most aggressive seeker of another electron.  It's the most electromagnetically negatively charged element in the entire world.  It basically is the most interactive of all the elements… It will give up whatever it's with to be with something else…
So it's prized by industry because it actually disrupts molecular bonds… Industry also wants it because it creates tighter molecular bonds.  So Scotchgard, Stain Master, Gore-Tex, ski gear… These are all fluoride-type compounds as well because they actually make it a tighter molecular bond that is more impervious to penetration. 
… By the time you get to the enzyme activity, and knowing what it can do to disrupt enzyme activity, the effects are so widespread, it's just amazing... Once [people] learn the nature of fluoride, they would never want to put it in their water."

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

WOW!! New documentary on fluoride by none other than, Dr. David Kennedy!!!!

FLUORIDEGATE The Film is a new documentary that reveals the tragedy of how the United States government, industry and trade associations protect and promote a policy known to cause harm to our country and especially to small children who suffer more than any other segment of the population. While government motivation remains uncertain, the outcome is crystal clear: the fluoridation policy is destroying our nation.  [Go to this website to view entire movie: ]

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

And from Dr. Mercola - 3 Videos - Documented evidence that the new flu vaccine is genetically modified with insects and dog kidneys

First Genetically Engineered Flu Vaccine Now on the Market

January 29, 2013

Story at-a-glance

  • To speed up flu vaccine production, the US FDA has approved a new insect-based, genetically engineered flu vaccine, as well as vaccines grown in cultures of dog kidney cells rather than eggs
  • This year’s flu vaccine contains a very good match to the circulating strains, yet the reported efficacy of the vaccine is still only slightly over 60 percent
  • In a wholly irresponsible move, some “health experts” are now proclaiming the conventional egg-based flu vaccine safe for those with severe egg allergies, and that the benefit of the flu vaccine (which this year has an official efficacy rating of about 60 percent) outweighs the potential risk of lethal anaphylaxis
  • According to a recent review of published research, flu vaccines are ineffective at best, and produce neurological complications at worst, while having no effect at all on hospitalizations or working days lost. For infants, inactivated flu vaccine was found to have the same effectiveness as a placebo

New research on Vitamin D shows evidence of stopping the hard-to-kill triple-negative breast cancer, as well as break down drug-resistant cancer to respond to drugs again!

Can vitamin D halt growth of triple-negative breast cancer?

Tuesday, January 29, 2013 by: David Gutierrez

(NaturalNews) Vitamin D supplementation may be able to slow or even halt the progression of the most dangerous variety of breast cancer, according to a study conducted by researchers from Saint Louis University and IRBLleida, Spain, and published in The Journal of Cell Biology. In addition, the researchers isolated biomarkers that could help physicians identify women that could benefit from vitamin D treatment...

...Scientists have known for some time that a malfunction of a tumor-suppressing gene known as BRCA1 can lead to the development of breast cancer. This gene is part of the cellular defense system by which the body ensures that any damaged DNA is not passed on to new cells, using mechanisms such as screening DNA for errors and sending cells carrying damaged DNA into hibernation or even programmed cell death. This is an important cancer-preventive role, because an accumulation of DNA damage can lead a cell to the out-of-control replication associated with cancerous tumors...

Learn more:

Below is the CBS News article - about the retired senior scientist from the pharmaceutical industry with a published article in the Journal of Immunotoxicology who wanted to warn the public about what's inside the vaccines since she was not allowed to do it before she retired

Warning: Many childhood vaccines contain aborted human fetal protein, DNA

Tuesday, January 29, 2013 by: Ethan A. Huff

"...So what we know is that aborted fetal cell lies, GM human albumin, and human albumin and DNA derived from other unknown sources are all being used to develop many of the vaccines being injected into society's most fragile and sensitive members today. If this is not a serious cause for concern, then it is hard to know what is, especially as allergies, asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, autism, and many other chronic health conditions continue to escalate inexplicably."

Learn more:

Vaccines and autism: a new scientific review

March 31, 2011 11:32 AM
By Sharyl Attkisson
Topics News

autism, vaccine, generic CBS/
For all those who've declared the autism-vaccine debate over - a new scientific review begs to differ. It considers a host of peer-reviewed, published theories that show possible connections between vaccines and autism.
The article in the Journal of Immunotoxicology is entitled "Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes--A review." The author is Helen Ratajczak, surprisingly herself a former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm. Ratajczak did what nobody else apparently has bothered to do: she reviewed the body of published science since autism was first described in 1943. Not just one theory suggested by research such as the role of MMR shots, or the mercury preservative thimerosal; but all of them.

Ratajczak's article states, in part, that "Documented causes of autism include genetic mutations and/or deletions, viral infections, and encephalitis [brain damage] following vaccination [emphasis added]. Therefore, autism is the result of genetic defects and/or inflammation of the brain."

The article goes on to discuss many potential vaccine-related culprits, including the increasing number of vaccines given in a short period of time. "What I have published is highly concentrated on hypersensitivity, Ratajczak told us in an interview, "the body's immune system being thrown out of balance."

University of Pennsylvania's Dr. Brian Strom, who has served on Institute of Medicine panels advising the government on vaccine safety says the prevailing medical opinion is that vaccines are scientifically linked to encephalopathy (brain damage), but not scientifically linked to autism. As for Ratajczak's review, he told us he doesn't find it remarkable. "This is a review of theories. Science is based on facts. To draw conclusions on effects of an exposure on people, you need data on people. The data on people do not support that there is a relationship. As such, any speculation about an explanation for a (non-existing) relationship is irrelevant."

Helen Ratajczak, author "Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes--A review."
Ratajczak also looks at a factor that hasn't been widely discussed: human DNA contained in vaccines. That's right, human DNA. Ratajczak reports that about the same time vaccine makers took most thimerosal out of most vaccines (with the exception of flu shots which still widely contain thimerosal), they began making some vaccines using human tissue. Ratajczak says human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines. She discusses the increase in autism incidences corresponding with the introduction of human DNA to MMR vaccine, and suggests the two could be linked. Ratajczak also says an additional increased spike in autism occurred in 1995 when chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue.

Why could human DNA potentially cause brain damage? The way Ratajczak explained it to me: "Because it's human DNA and recipients are humans, there's homologous recombinaltion tiniker. That DNA is incorporated into the host DNA. Now it's changed, altered self and body kills it. Where is this most expressed? The neurons of the brain. Now you have body killing the brain cells and it's an ongoing inflammation. It doesn't stop, it continues through the life of that individual."

Dr. Strom said he was unaware that human DNA was contained in vaccines but told us, "It does not matter...Even if human DNA were then found in vaccines, it does not mean that they cause autism." Ratajczak agrees that nobody has proven DNA causes autism; but argues nobody has shown the opposite, and scientifically, the case is still open.

A number of independent scientists have said they've been subjected to orchestrated campaigns to discredit them when their research exposed vaccine safety issues, especially if it veered into the topic of autism. We asked Ratajczak how she came to research the controversial topic. She told us that for years while working in the pharmaceutical industry, she was restricted as to what she was allowed to publish. "I'm retired now," she told CBS News. "I can write what I want."

We wanted to see if the CDC wished to challenge Ratajczak's review, since many government officials and scientists have implied that theories linking vaccines to autism have been disproven, and Ratajczak states that research shows otherwise. CDC officials told us that "comprehensive review by CDC...would take quite a bit of time." In the meantime, CDC provided these links:

Interagency Autism Coordination Committee:
Overview of all CDC surveillance and epi work:
CDC study on risk factors and causes:

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) investigated the recent CBS News investigative article about human tissue in baby vaccinations, and using only the FDA approved inserts that come with the vaccines, they made the below chart of what human tissue is included inside which baby vaccines

America's Vaccine Safety Watchdog
VIC Home & Learning Center
Human Protein & DNA

Which vaccines contain human protein and DNA?

The information in this table is drawn from vaccine package inserts downloaded from the FDA website.  The Vaccine Ingredients Calculator, following the lead of the package inserts, treats each source of human protein and DNA as a distinct ingredient.

Chicken Pox (Varivax)
Chicken Pox and MMR (ProQuad)
Hepatitis-A (Havrix)
Hepatitis-A (Vaqta)
DTaP, Hib, Polio (Pentacel)
Rabies (IMOVAX)
Rabies (RabAvert)

A recent CBS News Investigates article quotes a former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm who claims that human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines; however, we adhere strictly to the vaccine package inserts from the FDA as our ingredient data source and cannot confirm nor deny this (CBS News) claim.
Where did the human protein and DNA come from?

There are three main sources of human protein in vaccines: (1) fetal cell lines, (2) human albumin derived from human blood and (3) human albumin genetically engineered from yeast. 

The human DNA in vaccines comes from the MRC-5 fetal cell line (see below).

Human Protein from Fetal Cell Lines
  • The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week fetus aborted for psychiatric reasons from a 27 year old physically healthy woman.
  • The rubella vaccine currently used in the U.S. and in most countries was developed after an American researcher at the Wistar Institute cultured rubella virus from a fetus aborted because the mother was infected with rubella. This vaccine is called RA 27/3 because the rubella virus was isolated from the 27th aborted fetus sent to the Wistar Institute in the 1964 rubella outbreak.  For more information, scroll down to Rubella Vaccine Derived From Aborted Fetus Fuels Controversy.

  • This article, while incomplete regarding the sources of human protein/DNA and the vaccines in which they are found, attempts to explain why some vaccines are grown in cell cultures that were originally obtained from human fetuses.
Genetically Engineered Human Albumin
  • Currently (as of April 2011), only the MMR vaccine contains genetically engineered human protein, which is produced under the brand name Recombumin and referred to as "recombinant human albumin" in the package insert. 
Human albumin derived from human blood
  • The package inserts do not contain any information about where the human blood is sourced from.

  • The National Hemophilia Foundation is a good source of information about blood supply and product safety

Monday, January 28, 2013

Newest Research on Cancer - How to Starve it to death - How to prevent it - How to keep it from coming back

How This Important Mineral Reduces Your Risk of Cancer

January 26, 2013

US Cancer Death Rates on the Decline, But Cancer Incidence is Still Rising. Here’s Why...

January 26, 2013

Dramatically Effective New Natural Way to Starve Cancer and Obesity

June 08, 2010

From Dr. Mercola - 2 videos on how to live longer - the way you sit down on the floor and get up gives you the score of how long you will live, as per a study from Brazil, and the score can be reversed with the correct lifestyle changes - the other video is an exercise demonstration for those who sit all day at work or home with computers, etc.

Can You Do This? Simple Sitting Test May Help Predict Longevity
January 25, 2013

Story at-a-glance

  • How well you can sit and rise from the floor, without using assistance form your hands, knees or other body parts, may predict your risk of dying prematurely in the next six years.
  • Those who scored the lowest, requiring the most assistance to sit and rise from the floor, were 6.5 times more likely to die during the study period than those who scored the highest.
  • The “sitting-rising test” measures your fitness at the most basic level, testing not only muscular strength but also flexibility, balance and motor coordination. All of these attributes are essential for day-to-day living, and for maintaining your independence as you age.
  • You can extend not only the quantity of your years, but also the quality, by making a few simple changes to your lifestyle, involving diet, exercise, stress reduction and more.

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Dr. Mercola, MD - Says to Sign Up for "The American Gut Project" at University of Colorado-Boulder - It's all about the good gut flora!

Five Strategies for a Healthier Gut in 2013

January 24, 2013                                                                                                                                                                            By Jeff Leach 

Story at-a-glance

  • Microbes in your gut can change profoundly throughout your life, and you can change them through diet, medications, and hygiene.
  • Five strategies to help improve your gut flora include avoiding antibiotics, eating more whole plant foods and fermented foods, opening a window to the outdoors, and working in your garden.
  • The American Gut Project will evaluate how different diets impact gut flora, and in turn how different gut flora impacts your health. Deadline for signup is February 2, 2013. (Side Note: Choose which kit donation you want--from $99 per kit on up--and then mail your stool/skin/or oral sample to the University for analysis of your gut flora, with the opportunity of getting another kit donation to follow up on any improvement analysis)
  • The profound breakthrough technology that was used to sequence the human genome can now help you know what type of bacteria are living in your intestine.

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Advertised Fluoride Movie last April 2012 - to be finished & in Theaters in 2 months after that - Now on DVD!

"The Great Culling: Our Water" Official Movie (FIRST 33 MIN)


4 Videos - Check out Anti-Fluoride Messages on YouTube!

Fluoridation Presentation in Quad Cities 1st of 2 Nights

<iframe width="415" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The Fluoride Deception exposes the truth about water fluoridation and the phosphate mining industry

<iframe width="415" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


<iframe width="415" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


<iframe width="415" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Fluoride Updates - Las Vegas & Netherlands (they used medical science to eliminate fluoride in their country! Check out the summary of their medical science below)

Time to End Water Fluoridation in Las Vegas

January 2013

Evidence based Medical Science used to end policy of fluoridation of drinking water in the Netherlands.
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
(Before It's News) Editor’s note:On the Awaken Ireland Facebook page the author writes (emphasis added by Editor):

Folks it hard not to get angry when you read this. Dr. Hans Moolenburgh “As a summary of our research, we are now convinced that fluoridation of the water supplies causes the whole population to be subjected to low grade poisoning” Here are the medical and scientific facts that resulted in the Minister for Health in the Netherlands being forced to resign in disgrace in 1974 and their constitution being changed to prevent the Government from ever again using drinking water as a means to medicate its population.”

We cannot agree more. Related articles here, here, here, here, here, here , here, here, here, and here.

by Declan Waugh,  B.SC, C.Env., MCIWEM, MIEMA, MCIWM
published here with permission of the author
first published on the authors blog Fluoride Free Water 8 Jan 2013

This is a summary of information complied from public record and published peer reviewed journals on the history of fluoridation in the Netherlands. It explains how medical based science resulted in the termination of fluoridation in this Country, thanks largely to Dr. Hans Moolenburgh, a Medical Physician, Cancer Specialist, and Clinical Ecologist who with a team of medical doctors and medical researchers conclusively demonstrated that fluoridation of drinking water resulted in the population being subjected to low grade poisoning by fluoride with wide ranging medical side effects.
Hans C. Moolenburgh, M.D., graduated as a medical doctor from the University of Leyden in 1952. He was a general practitioner in the city of Haarlem in the Netherlands since April 1953. Apart from being a G.P., his main interests were clinical ecology and complementary forms of cancer treatment.

(Read the rest of the medical science Netherland used at the above web link)

Citizens for Health still fighting the High Fructose Corn Syrup industry

January 22, 2013

High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) - An Incipient Agricultural Apocalypse?
Dear Citizen for Health, blogger and frequent contributor to CFH, Linda Bonvie, has posted an interesting new article to the CFH website about the rampant use of HFCS and its chilling implications for U.S. agriculture. Read it here: "Is high fructose corn syrup helping to bring on an agricultural apocalypse?".
CFH is committed to defending your Right To Know and expanding your access to the truthful, straightforward information you need to make appropriate decisions about your health and wellness. You are familiar with our successful campaign to stop the re-branding of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) as "corn sugar" - an attempt by the Corn Refiners Association (CRA) to dupe consumers rebuffed by the FDA in 2012.
The problem: HFCS is still out there and there are no requirements to inform you of how much HFCS is in the products you buy. That's why we've submitted a petition to the FDA advocating for labels clearly stating the concentration of fructose in any food item containing HFCS. We're also asking the FDA to take action against food sellers who use unapproved formulas of HFCS.
Please take a few moments to post comments directly to the FDA in support of our petition. You can do so here. For more information to support your comments, click here. (Please mention that you are a health-conscious food consumer. Let them know that you care about what you eat and that you require accurate information to make good decisions about your diet. If you have any professional connections to the food industry - science, administration, legal, labor, ANY - let the agency know. The FDA offers tips on commenting here).
And please be sure to take advantage of our resources for spreading the word - click on any of the links below and share far and wide! Please also forward this alert to all those you know who want to control what they put into their bodies, and forgive us for any duplication or cross-posting of information you've already received as we continue to send alerts on this in coming weeks.
Thanks, as always, for your participation,
The Citizens for Health Team

Follow Citizens for Health on Twitter! And please help us score big in the Charity Challenge. Follow @WeCare and anytime you send a tweet that includes @WeCare, @citizens4health, and #MillionDimes, $.10 is donated to CFH. Tweet up to 5x/day, and those organizations with the most tweets can win $1000!
Like Citizens for Health on Facebook!

Check out Citizens for Health on YouTube!

Check out Citizens for Health on google+!

Check out Citizens for Health on Pinterest!

Like FoodIdentityTheft on Facebook!

Follow FoodIdentityTheft on Twitter!

Wondering how our bodies develop health problems? Toxins that cut off oxygen to our cells - here's a list and where we get exposed to them

Everyday heavy metal toxicity

Tuesday, January 22, 2013 by: Hesh Goldstein
(NaturalNews) We have no idea of the heavy metal dangers lurking about us. So, I am gong to present common heavy metals, what they may cause in cumulative amounts and their common sources.

Constipation; Vomiting; Learning difficulties; Mental retardation; Hyperactivity; Vertigo; Gout, arthritis; kidney damage; Birth defects; Coordination inabilities; Muscle weakness; Anorexia; Seizures; Cirrhosis of the liver; Metallic taste sensations; Thyroid dysfunction; Nausea; Diarrhea; Difficulty in concentration; Confusion; Restlessness; Insomnia; Muscle aches; Fatigue; Pituitary damage; Impotence/sterility; Tremors; Degeneration of motor neurons; Schizophrenic-like behavior; Growth problems in long bones; Cataracts; Headaches; Anemia; Lead-lined gums.

Emphysema; Hypertension; Kidney damage; Arteriosclerosis; Abdominal cramps; Colic; Diarrhea; Slow healing acne; Nausea/vomiting; Liver disease; Anemia.
Tremors; Birth defects; Kidney damage; Nausea; Loss of hearing or vision; Gingivitis; Vertigo; Nervousness; Fatigue; Chromosome damage; Insanity; Abdominal pain; Vomiting; Mental retardation; Tooth loss; Headaches; Skin eruptions.

Digestive disorders; Colic; Gastritis; Dementia; Alzheimer's; Seizures; Motor and behavioral dysfunction; Skin rash; Headache.

Mental disorders; Anemia; Arthritis/rheumatoid arthritis; Hypertension; Nausea/vomiting; Hyperactivity; Schizophrenia; Insomnia; Autism; stuttering; Copper deposits in kidney, liver, brain, eyes; Postpartum psychosis; Inflammation and enlargement of liver; Heart problems; Cystic fibrosis.
(Read the rest to learn where these toxins are picked up the most and how:)
Learn more:

Thursday, January 17, 2013

ADA and AMA already declared fluoride as a "protoplasmic poison" in their own journals back in 1936 and 1943---Are these the same "older" studies they cite as "scientific proof" that fluoride is "safe and effective?"


Is the fluosilicic acid used in community water supplies by water fluoridation schemes as innocuous to human health as promoters make it out to be?

A fluorosilicic acid, ether of two silicon fluorides, is what's most commonly used as a water additive in North America and most fluoridating countries for the stated claim of reducing or preventing tooth decay.

This acid releases fluoride ions into the public water supply to a stated controlled value now at 0.7 ppm (or, 7 mg per liter, or, 7 mg per kg) concentration. The concentration may not remain at that value throughout the distribution system depending on circumstances. The ethics, morality and legal issues aside, this "concentration" does not allow for different amounts of water consumption in the individuals in the treated population, which can lead to overdoses. This also means that all foods and beverages prepared with tap water will contain a form of fluoride in them which adds to the toxic load. This way of treating the population also does not account for the health status, genetic makeup, pre-existing chemical sensitivities of individuals consuming such water, nutritional intake and any predispositions to illness considerations of the treated individuals.

Testing is only done for the Fluoride ion concentration, but not for hydrogen fluoride, none of the co-contaminants that come with the "fluoride," residual silicon fluoride, any the many compounds that may form due to recomplexing of the Fluoride ion with the chemicals used in water treatment, chlorine, chloramine, Ph balancers, Alum, and others, and any remaining organics in suspension.
It is a fact that the toxic "fluoride" industrial waste used may also contain but not limited to: fluorine, hydrogen fluoride, lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, chromium, phosphorus, iron, iodine, silver, plus uranium238, barium, radon, cobalt, radium, polonium and possibly others because it is derived from the mining processes used to extract the phosphate used in the super phosphate fertilizer industry, mostly from Florida but sometimes imported from China.
Fluoride (F-) is a known protoplasmic poison, as admitted in
1. the Journal of the American Dental Association, Volume 23, page 568, April, 1936, titled Fluorine in relation to bone and tooth development by Floyd DeEds, Phd. and
2. the Journal of the American Medical Association, Sept 18, 1943, Editorial. "Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons”

More Tips to Help The 2013 Resolutions for Better Well Being

5 Tropical Fruits that Can Change Your Life

  • Coconut,
  • Mangosteen,
  • Avocado,
  • Mango, and
  • Longan berries

  • Ten Best Foods to Eat Frequently for a Terrific Health Kick...

    # 1 Organic Pastured Eggs, Preferably Raw

    # 2 Kale

    # 3 Raw Grass-Fed Organic Kefir or Yoghurt

    # 4 Raw Organic Almonds

    # 5 Wild Alaskan Salmon

    # 6 Avocado

    # 7 Organic Coconut Oil

    # 8 Whey Protein Concentrate

    # 9 Raw Organic Grass-Fed Butter

    # 10 Green Vegetable Juice

    Free Video - A-H-A! The Empowering Process that Ends Self-Sabotage

    Free Video:
    About the author of the Video:
    Watch the free video
    The A-H-A! Process: An End to Self-Sabotage and discover the lost keys to deep personal change and emotional health that have been suppressed by mainstream mental health.
    Mike Bundrant is co-founder of the iNLP Center and host of Mental Health Exposed, a Natural News Radio program.
    Follow Mike Bundrant on Facebook for daily personal development tips.

    Psychiatrists mourn 43% decline in use of electroshock therapy

    Thursday, January 17, 2013 by: Mike Bundrant

    Learn more:

    Wednesday, January 16, 2013

    East Germany (formerly Communist Germany) Terminates Fluoride and Uses VERY Credible Evidence to Make Their Decision from The DVGW (which is the oldest independent and unbiased technical and scientific Gas and Water Association in the World) Repeat: the WORLD!!

    Statement Against Water Fluoridation by the German Technical and Scientific Association for Gas and Water
    Tuesday, January 15, 2013
    by Declan Waugh
    published here with permission of the author
    published first on his blog 3 Jan 2013

    In 1992, following unification of Germany the DVGW  (German Technical and Scientific Association for Gas and Water) issued a professional statement on water fluoridation which highlighted the risk management, hazard analysis and public safety concerns regarding fluoridation of drinking water supplies. 

    Water fluoridation was practiced in the former GFR up to 1990. Upon unification the practice of artificial fluoridation was immediately terminated on health, ethical and environmental grounds in all regions throughout the former East Germany.

    The (current) statement by the DVGW was issued as a number of dental professionals raised concerns that by terminating fluoridation of drinking water the dental health of the population would deteriorate significantly.  Similar opinions have been raised by the Minister for Health in Ireland as justification for continuing with the policy of mandatory fluoridation of drinking water supplies. Ireland remains the last country in the EU to support the mandatory fluoridation of drinking water supplies.

    The DVGW is the oldest independent and unbiased technical and scientific Gas and Water Association in the World. The DVGW has 13,000 members, 400 employees and 3 affiliated research institutes and has been providing technical and scientific support for the German gas and water industry since 1859.  The DVGW work with the Federal Minister for Health and the Federal Environmental Agency in developing National guidelines for water management, water quality and risk management as well as ensuring the provision of safe drinking water supplies. 

    All the activities of the DVGW focus on safety, hygiene and environmental protection, taking efficiency and cost-effectiveness into consideration to ensure safe gas and water supplies at the highest international levels.

    These same principles of management were applied by the DVGW to the examination of fluoridation of drinking water.

    The following are direct quotes from the DVGW position statement on fluoridation of drinking water supplies:

    (1) “It is not the task of water supply companies to add substances to drinking water intended as prophylactics against illness not caused by drinking water.” 

    (2) “Caries is not the manifestation of fluoride deficiency, but is the result of a generally false nutrition and inefficient dental hygiene. Unwholesome habits resulting in caries are not eliminated by the fluoridation of drinking water; on the contrary, they are promoted.” 

    (3) “The suggested optimal fluoride concentration of 1 mg per litre is very close to the dose with which long term detrimental effects in people cannot be excluded. . . the limit value in drinking water cannot be justified in view of different habits and therefore differing consumption of drinking water and the uncontrolled intake of fluorides from other sources. The safety of a lifelong accumulation of fluoride in the human body as a result of increased intake is disputed in medical science throughout the world.”

    (4) “More than 99 per cent [of fluoride contained in drinking water] would be discharged with waste water directly into the environment. This additional fluoride emission into waters is unacceptable for ecological reasons.” 

    (5) “The consumer cannot avoid fluoridated drinking water made available by public water supply. This mandatory intake of fluoride violates the basic right to bodily freedom from injury . . . provided by the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.” 

    (6) “Fluoride intake for the prevention of caries is more effective with specific measures taken by the individual than by fluoridation of drinking water.” 

    (7) “An assessment of risks vs. benefits involving both the health aspects and ecological consequences justifies DVGW’s rejection of the fluoridation of drinking water.”

    The position paper of the DVGW is available to view at:

    What is however most interesting is that post-cessation of water fluoridation, contrary to the opinions of the dental profession warning of dire dental health consequences for the population, dental health among the population improved to the highest standards since before fluoridation began in 1959.[1]

    This occurred in spite of the fact that only natural water without added fluoride was available to all citizens.

    Further research[2] also documented that in contrast to the anticipated increase in dental caries following the cessation of water fluoridation, a different caries trend was observed with a significant fall in caries prevalence. This trend corresponded to the national caries decline and appeared to be a new population-wide phenomenon. This research provided further support to demonstrate that fluoridation of water is ineffective in preventing caries prevalence and may contribute to an increase in dental decay due to fluoridation of water. Similar experiences showing a significant improvement in dental health were observed in other countries that stopped fluoridation in particular Chile, Finland, the Netherlands, Japan and Sweden. Despite the overwhelming international evidence to the contrary, public health authorities in countries that continue to promote water fluoridation continue to make misinformed and inaccurate statements in support of this outdated and dangerous policy.

    [1] Kunzel W,Fischer T. Rise and fall of caries prevalence in German towns with different F concentrations in drinking water. Caries Res. 1997;31(3):166-73.
    [2] Künzel W, Fischer T, Lorenz R, Brühmann S. Decline of caries prevalence after the cessation of water fluoridation in the former East Germany. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;28(5):382-9.

    Info to help 2013 Resolutions

    Top 25 healthy muscle building foods

    Wednesday, January 16, 2013

    Learn more:
    ....Having a lean and muscular physique provides many benefits. One of the most important is that muscle tissue burns through calories, even while at rest. This in turn increases the metabolism and boosts energy levels all day long, while keeping the body trim. Muscles also help burn the fat stores in the areas around them...

    Top 25 healthy muscle building foods

    1. Water - although this one isn't actually a food it certainly is the most important item on this list, as muscle tissue is comprised of over 75 percent water
    2. Whey protein concentrate - the most complete amino acid profile among any food
    3. Pea protein powder - a very complete protein source; great for vegans
    4. Free range organic eggs - next to whey protein, contains the highest concentration of essential amino acids
    5. Raw milk - a protein and vitamin rich food known for its muscle building properties
    6. Bison - higher in protein than beef and are not confined to feedlots
    7. Free range organic chicken breast - rich in glutamine and other essential amino acids
    8. Grass fed organic beef - grass fed beef is much higher in CLA, which aids in body composition
    9. Fish - wild salmon and tilapia are among the best; avoid tuna due to high mercury levels
    10. Turkey - a very lean protein source
    11. Nuts - walnuts, Brazil nuts and almonds are among the best
    12. Oysters - great for naturally boosting testosterone levels
    13. Beans - a very slow digesting carbohydrate high in zinc and fiber
    14. Oats - steel cut are best but old fashioned work too; avoid quick oats
    15. Peanut butter - high in healthy fats and protein and low in carbohydrates
    16. Cottage cheese - very low in sugar and high in protein
    17. Yogurt - Greek yogurt is best
    18. Bananas - a potassium and vitamin rich food
    19. Avocados - very rich in unsaturated fatty acids
    20. Healthy oils - olive oil, coconut oil, walnut oil, hemp oil, flax seed oil as well as others
    21. Spinach- other green leafy vegetables offer similar benefits
    22. Broccoli - a superfood vegetable; others include tomatoes, kale, cauliflower and bok choy
    23. Berries - high in antioxidants and many other vitamins necessary for muscle growth
    24. Quinoa and brown rice - both are rich in B vitamins and slow digesting
    25. Apples and other fruit - high in fiber which cleanses the system and allows for better nutrient absorption

    As always, purchase organic or local items when possible to avoid toxins and get more nutrients out of your foods. It's also important to limit alcohol consumption as it retards muscle growth. By consuming these foods regularly along with weekly muscle building exercises you will see a substantial increase in muscle tone and overall health.

    Sources for this article include:

    The "Meat" You Should Avoid - Contains 70 Ingredients (Including Shoe Rubber)

    The Unsavory Truth of the McRib and Other Fake Foods, and Why Russia Banned US-Raised Meat

    January 16, 2013

    Story at-a-glance

    • Sneaky “tricks of the trade” employed by the meat industry include “pink slime” made of otherwise unusable scraps, meat glue, and reconstituted meat—all of which fool you into thinking you’re buying something of higher quality than you are
    • McDonald’s seasonally-available McRib sandwich contains more than 70 ingredients, including a chemical used in gym shoes and other items requiring a rubbery substance. And the pork is actually a restructured meat product made from the less expensive innards and scraps from the pig
    • Russia has recently banned U.S. meat supplies after discovering it contains ractopamine—a beta agonist drug that increases protein synthesis, thereby making the animal more muscular. This reduces the fat content of the meat. Ractopamine is known to affect the human cardiovascular system, may cause food poisoning, and is thought to be responsible for hyperactivity, muscle breakdown, and increased death and disability in livestock
    • As much as 20 percent of ractopamine remains in the meat you buy from the supermarket. Despite potential health risks, the drug is used in 45 percent of U.S. pigs, 30 percent of ration-fed cattle, and an unknown percentage of turkeys

    Tuesday, January 15, 2013

    One of the world’s foremost published pro-fluoridation experts teaches at the University of Iowa, yet he has declined to participate (in debate with Dr. Paul Connett). Dozens of local dentists have been made aware of this opportunity to publicly prove Connett wrong, but unfortunately none has yet stepped forward. Ironically, the tables are turning, as cities and counties that have the debate and cease fluoridation can be considered beacons for development as healthful, livable communities – similar to having amenities such as public transportation, farmers’ markets, biking trails, and biking road lanes. If the science does point to more harm than good, then why in the world would bureaucrats and politicians – who purportedly work on your behalf – continue business as usual, 60 years later, without a debate?

    The Tables Are Turning on the Fluoridation Debate

    Written by Todd McGreevy   
    Wednesday, 09 January 2013

    Wednesday, 09 January 2013

    In the 1940s and ’50s, print and TV ads depicted, of all things, doctors and professional athletes enjoying the soothing benefits of smoking cigarettes. One TV spot stated, “In a repeated national survey, doctors of all branches of medicine, doctors in all parts of the country, were asked, ‘What cigarette do you smoke, doctor?’ More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette” (

    Of course, since then we’ve all wised up and realized the absurdity of the message that cigarettes are a healthy habit. Under the premise of healthful living, in 1952 the City of Davenport contracted with the Iowa Water Company to add fluoride to the public water supply ( Sixty years later, it’s time to wise up and realize the absurdity of this practice ... or at a minimum, with the benefit of scientific research, have a public debate about medicating the populace through the public water supply.... (read more at above web link)
    Written by Todd McGreevy   
    Wednesday, 09 January 2013

    South Florida Holistic Dentistry Gives Reasons WHY Americans are Turning AGAINST Fluoride

    Assure a Smile
    Fluoridation Across North AmericaO’Fallon, Missouri. With a population of just over 80,000, O’Fallon is the seventh largest town in Missouri. Earlier this year, citizen activists informed city employees of the potential dangers of water fluoridation. City officials responded with a reevaluation their fluoridation practice. Ultimately, the city decided to discontinue water fluoridation altogether. In the O’Fallon 2012 Annual Budget, officials happily report that the fiscal year saw a number of positive changes, one of which was the elimination of fluoride from public drinking water:

    “One such improvement is the elimination of the addition of fluoride to the potable water supplied by the Water Treatment Plant (WTP), [which has] saved the City $18,000 annually and reduced the hazard for operators in that they do not have to handle the dangerous chemical on a regular basis,” (ii).

    Rosetown, Saskatchewan. North of the United States, the Canadian community of Rosetown has voted to end water fluoridation after an incident at the town’s water treatment facility caused the fluoride-feed pump to burst. It is thought that the feed likely burst due to corrosion, and the community does not plan to repair the pipe. Instead, the community of approximately 2,300 will have access to clean, natural, fluoride-free drinking water.

    Lake View, Iowa. In Iowa, the community of Lake View has also decided to discontinue water fluoridation practices. While concerns for health and public safety have been the primary motivators for removing fluoride from water in other communities, the town of Lake View points to another reason: Cost. As a potentially toxic practice with little-to-no economic benefit, water fluoridation is a financial burden that many communities, like Lake View, simply cannot justify.

    Cassadaga, New York. Residents of the town of Cassadaga rallied in overwhelming numbers to oppose the retroactive fluoridation of the town’s water system. With more than 75% of residents saying “No” to fluoride, the town’s Board Members supported the community in a 4-1 decision that rejected the fluoride proposal. The 600 members of the community are now safe from fluoridated water, along with some 300 citizens of the neighboring town of Lily Dale who share Cassadaga’s water supply.
    This special health report has been produced by Assure a Smile, South Florida’s Home of Holistic Dentistry. For more information, readers are invited to visit the URLs in the Sources section below. Readers may also schedule an appointment with a Miami dentist online, or call our front desk directly at 305-274-0047.

    Sources for this report include:
    (i) Heck, Josh. With failure of Wichita Fluoride Vote. Accessed November 13th, 2012.
    (ii) City of O’Fallon 2012 Budget (click to download the .pdf)

    From Dr. Mercola - More Water Problems to Consider

    Threats to Your Water Supply Abound -- The Devastating Impact of Fertilizers, Fracking, and Water-Hungry GMO’s

    January 15, 2013

    Drinking Water

    Story at-a-glance

    • Many residents of Minnesota now face having elevated levels of nitrogen in their drinking water, due to fertilizer runoff. Health risks of nitrogen include a potential connection to cancer, as well as thyroid and reproductive problems in both humans and livestock
    • Unless you are getting your water from a well that is located 800 feet or more below the ground surface, chances are your well water has been contaminated by some, if not many, toxic substances that have been dumped into the ground soil over past decades
    • There are more than 140 chemicals in U.S. drinking water supplies that are not regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This includes gasoline, pesticides, rocket fuel, prescription drugs and more
    • Whether you have a private well or use municipal water, it would be wise to get your water tested for contaminations. One of the best alternatives to tap water may be finding a gravity-fed raw spring in your area. The next best option is to filter the water that comes out of your tap
    Find a gravity-fed raw spring in your area by going to this website: